Training program on motivational interviewing for prison professionals

针对监狱专业人员的动机式访谈培训项目

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of a motivational interviewing (MI) training program for prison professionals by analysing the progression of MI-compatible competence and adherence, as well as the reduction of non-compatible practices. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A longitudinal quasi-experimental study with repeated measures was conducted over four months at three time points. A total of 25 correctional professionals participated in a three-phase training program. A Spanish-translated version of the Motivational Interviewing Assessment: Supervisory Tools for Enhancing Proficiency (MIA:STEP) questionnaire from Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) was used for self-assessment. Statistical analyses included repeated measures ANOVA, Friedman's test, effect size (h(2)), and observed power. RESULTS: Non-compatible adherence to MI significantly decreased (p <0.001, h(2) = 0.360; c(2) = 20.796, p <0.001), representing the most notable finding. Compatible competence in MI showed a non-significant increase in ANOVA (p = 0.138), but a significant improvement in Friedman's test (c(2) = 9.621, p = 0.008). Compatible adherence initially increased (p <0.001, h(2) = 0.267) but subsequently declined (c(2) = 9.939, p = 0.007). Non-compatible competence significantly increased between the initial and final assessments (p = 0.012, h(2) = 0.169; c(2) = 9.711, p = 0.008). DISCUSSION: The program was effective in significantly reducing non-compatible adherence to MI, which emerged as the most substantial outcome. While compatible adherence fluctuated and compatible competence exhibited a differentiated progression depending on the statistical test used, the findings indicate progressive learning and areas requiring further reinforcement. The ecological validity of the study design strengthens the applicability of the results, providing evidence of the impact of MI training in correctional settings.The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Salamanca (CEISH).

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。