Macrofollicular Architecture in Invasive Encapsulated Follicular Variant of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Pitfall in Thyroid Practice

Predominantly macrofollicular architecture in invasive encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (IEFVPTC-MF) is rare and often a cause of misinterpretation during pre-operative work-up and histopathology evaluation. We comprehensively evaluated the radiological, cytological, gross, microscopic, molecular and follow-up characteristics of four such cases, intending to increase its recognition and add our experience to the limited literature available.

Macrofollicular architecture in invasive encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma is a major pitfall in thyroid oncology practice. Long-standing disease, and ultrasonographic and cytological features that overlap with benign disease, often lead to underdiagnosis during pre-operative evaluation. As patients may consequently develop distant metastases and have inadequate treatment response, there is a need for more vigilant understanding of the spectrum of macrofollicular thyroid disease for accurate diagnosis. ETV6::NTRK3 or other fusions, when found, present opportunities for targeted therapy.

All such histopathologically-proven cases of IEFVPTC-MF were retrieved from the departmental archives. The clinical details, thyroid ultrasound, cytology and thyroid scan findings were reviewed. Allele-specific PCR for BRAF p.V600E, KRAS, NRAS, and HRAS mutations, and FISH assays for ETV6::NTRK3 fusion and RET fusions were performed.

There were four cases of IEFVPTC-MF diagnosed between 2021 and 2022, involving two males and two females. The median age at presentation was 27 years, and the duration of the disease was 1-10 years. Thyroid ultrasound was TR1 (benign; n = 1), TR2 (not suspicious; n = 2), or TR4 (moderately suspicious; n = 1). Cytology was categorized as nondiagnostic (n = 1), benign (n = 1), and atypia of undetermined significance (n = 1). The three nodules with available cytology smears showed abundant colloid. Cells were arranged as sheets/microfollicles/clusters. Nuclei were predominantly round with minimal/focal elongation, membrane irregularity, and cellular crowding. On gross examination, cut surfaces of the tumors showed variable amounts of colloid. The tumors were solid-cystic. Histopathology revealed partially encapsulated multinodular tumors. There were prominent pseudopapillae projecting into the lumina of macrofollicles. Nuclei were predominantly round with variable nuclear atypia, including chromatin clearing and multifocal presence of nuclear grooves. Pseudoinclusions were identified in two. Molecular analysis revealed NRAS codon 61 mutation and ETV6::NTRK3 fusion in one case each. Two patients had cervical lymph node and hematogenous metastases. Post-radio-active iodine, the response was structurally incomplete (n = 2), indeterminate (n = 1) and excellent (n = 1). Conclusions: Macrofollicular architecture in invasive encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma is a major pitfall in thyroid oncology practice. Long-standing disease, and ultrasonographic and cytological features that overlap with benign disease, often lead to underdiagnosis during pre-operative evaluation. As patients may consequently develop distant metastases and have inadequate treatment response, there is a need for more vigilant understanding of the spectrum of macrofollicular thyroid disease for accurate diagnosis. ETV6::NTRK3 or other fusions, when found, present opportunities for targeted therapy.