Ex vivo comparison of V.A.C.® Granufoam Silver™ and V.A.C.® Granufoam™ loaded with a first-in-class bis-dialkylnorspermidine-terphenyl antibiofilm agent

VAC® Granufoam Silver™ 与载有首创双二烷基去甲亚精胺-三联苯抗生物膜剂的 VAC® Granufoam™ 的体外比较

阅读:5
作者:Kaden B Rawson, Travis Neuberger, Tyler B Smith, Isaac J Bell, Ryan E Looper, Paul R Sebahar, Travis J Haussener, Hariprasada Reddy Kanna Reddy, Brad M Isaacson, John Shero, Paul F Pasquina, Dustin L Williams1

Abstract

Implementation of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) as a standard of care has proven efficacious in reducing both the healing time and likelihood of nosocomial infection among pressure ulcers and traumatic, combat-related injuries. However, current formulations may not target or dramatically reduce bacterial biofilm burden following therapy. The purpose of this study was to determine the antibiofilm efficacy of an open-cell polyurethane (PU) foam (V.A.C.® Granufoam™) loaded with a first-in-class compound (CZ-01179) as the active release agent integrated via lyophilized hydrogel scaffolding. An ex vivo porcine excision wound model was designed to perform antibiofilm efficacy testing in the presence of NPWT. PU foam samples loaded with a 10.0% w/w formulation of CZ-01179 and 0.5% hyaluronic acid were prepared and tested against current standards of care: V.A.C.® Granufoam Silver™ and V.A.C.® Granufoam™. We observed statistically significant reduction of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Acinetobacter baumannii biofilms with the CZ-01179 antibiofilm foam in comparison to current standard of care foams. These findings motivate further development of an antibiofilm PU foam loaded with CZ-01179.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。