Abstract
Current tests for assessing metamorphopsia do not account for confounders such as perceptual filling-in and spatial redundancy, which affect its sensitivity and repeatability. This proof-of-concept study aimed to assess the performance of a novel laboratory-based psychophysical test (Line Sag Test, LST) which addresses these issues for quantification of metamorphopsia in idiopathic epiretinal membranes. The LST quantifies perpendicular metamorphopsia at three eccentricities (3°, 6°, and 9°) along eight meridians (45° steps). Metamorphopsia was assessed using the LST and Amsler grid and the hit rates of both tests for detecting metamorphopsia were compared. Normal metamorphopsia scores using the LST did not differ significantly from 0 and fell within one step-size (p = 0.500). The LST detected significantly more cases of metamorphopsia than the Amsler grid (14/21 versus 3/21) (p = 0.003). Similarly, significantly more cases of visual distortions in asymptomatic iERMs were detected using the LST than the Amsler grid (11/18 versus 0/18) (p = 0.008). The LST has a higher hit rate compared to the Amsler grid (67% versus 14%). This work demonstrates a psychophysically-robust functional test addressing perceptual confounders is more sensitive for quantifying and localising metamorphopsia in macular disease, particularly in asymptomatic disease.