Abstract
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to describe an original method of bone-preserving arthroplasty with abductor pollicis longus (APL) tenodesis and determine its safety and effectiveness as a treatment for early-stage osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. METHODS: Eleven patients underwent a trapezium-preserving arthroplasty with APL tenodesis for stage 1 and 2 osteoarthritis were retrospectively reviewed. This arthroplasty consisted of a distally-based APL tendon being passed through the trapeziometacarpal joint. The proximal end of the tendon was then pulled and passed through a drill hole made at the neck of the second metacarpal and sutured to itself. Thus, distraction of the first metacarpal and interposition of the tendon were created. Postoperative radiologic and clinical follow-up visits were performed at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Range of motion and strength were assessed after surgery. Patient satisfaction and outcome were assessed, and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score was used. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 29.5 months (range, 16-43 months), the mean patient visual analog scale pain score improved from 7.1 to 2.3. The average DASH score of all patients at the follow-up examination was 18.3 ± 19.8. Patients' mean grip strength was 25.3 kg, which represented 102% of the value on the contralateral side. The key-pinch strength was 6.2 kg on the operated hand compared with 6.5 kg on the contralateral side. The mean thumb opposition Kapandji index was 9.4, which was similar to that of the contralateral side. Three patients were very satisfied with the postoperative outcome and 3 patients were satisfied. Two patients were lost to follow-up, 1 patient did not consent to share her data, and 2 patients had to undergo trapeziectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Although a larger study population and a longer follow-up period are needed to draw conclusions, bone-preserving arthroplasty with APL tenodesis showed satisfying results in patients presenting with early-stage osteoarthritis. This method is technically simple and time-efficient, does not reduce the range of motion, and leaves open all other surgical options. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV, Case Series.