Abstract
We introduce the "Prime-ligand" method for ranking ligands in congeneric series. The method employs a single scoring function, the OPLS-AA/GBSA molecular mechanics/implicit solvent model, for all stages of sampling and scoring. We evaluate the method using 12 test sets of congeneric series for which experimental binding data is available in the literature, as well as the structure of one member of the series bound to the protein. Ligands are "docked" by superimposing a common stem fragment among the compounds in the series using a crystal complex from the Protein Data Bank and sampling the conformational space of the variable region. Our results show good correlation between our predicted rankings and the experimental data for cases in which binding affinities differ by at least 1 order of magnitude. For 11 out of 12 cases, >90% of such ligand pairs could be correctly ranked, while for the remaining case, Factor Xa, 76% of such pairs were correctly ranked. A small number of compounds could not be docked using the current protocol because of the large size of functional groups that could not be accommodated by a rigid receptor. CPU requirements for the method, involving CPU minutes per ligand, are modest compared with more rigorous methods that use similar force fields, such as free energy perturbation. We also benchmark the scoring function using series of ligands bound to the same protein within the CSAR data set. We demonstrate that energy minimization of ligands in the crystal structures is critical to obtain any correlation with experimentally determined binding affinities.