Conclusion
PHOAR1 patients had inferior bone microstructure and strength compared with PHOAR2 patients and HCs. Additionally, this study was the first to find differences in the bone microstructure between PHOAR1 and PHOAR2 patients.
Methods
Twenty-seven male Chinese PHO patients (PHOAR1 = 7; PHOAR2 = 20) were recruited from Peking Union Medical College Hospital. The areal bone mineral density (aBMD) was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Peripheral bone microarchitecture at the distal radius and tibia were evaluated by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). Biochemical markers of PGE2, bone turnover, and Dickkopf-1 (DKK1) were investigated.
Purpose
The primary goal of this study was to assess bone microarchitecture and strength in PHOAR1 and PHOAR2 patients and to compare them with age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs). The secondary goal was to assess the differences between PHOAR1 and PHOAR2 patients.
Results
Compared with HCs, PHOAR1 and PHOAR2 patients had distinctively larger bone geometry, substantially lower vBMD at the radius and tibia, and compromised cortical microstructure at the radius. For trabecular bone, PHOAR1 and PHOAR2 patients showed different changes at the tibia. PHOAR1 patients had significant deficits in the trabecular compartment, resulting in lower estimated bone strength. Conversely, PHOAR2 patients showed a higher trabecular number, narrower trabecular separation, and lower trabecular network inhomogeneity than HCs, translating into preserved or slightly high estimated bone strength.