Abstract
OBJECTIVES: There is a controversy on the diagnostic reliability and accuracy of synovial fluid α-defensin in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the α-defensin lateral flow test in PJI. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched, and articles (up to January 2020) on the diagnosis of hip and knee PJIs using the α-defensin Synovasure lateral flow test were included. The diagnostic accuracy of the α-defensin lateral flow test in PJI was evaluated using meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and post-test probabilities were calculated. RESULTS: Seventeen studies including 1443 cases were included. Meta-analysis showed the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and a diagnostic odds ratio was 0.83 (95% CI 0.77, 0.88), 0.95 (95% CI 0.93, 0.97), 16.86 (95% CI 11.67, 24.37), 0.17 (95% CI 0.13, 0.24) and 85.30 (95% CI 47.76, 152.35), respectively. The area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.97 (95% CI 0.95, 0.98). Subgroup analysis also confirmed the high efficiency of α-defensin Synovasure lateral flow test in diagnosing PJIs, irrespective of ethnicity. Fagan's nomogram analysis there was a high positive post-test probability of 94% and a low negative post-test probability of 15%. CONCLUSIONS: We indicated that the α-defensin lateral flow test had a high accuracy for diagnosing PJI. Large-scale studies are needed to validate its significance in PJI diagnosis.