Real Assessment of Maximum Oxygen Uptake as a Verification After an Incremental Test Versus Without a Test

增量测试后与未进行测试时,对最大摄氧量进行真实评估的验证

阅读:1

Abstract

The study was conducted to compare peak oxygen uptake (VO(2peak)) measured with the incremental graded test (GXT) (VO(2) (peak)) and two tests to verify maximum oxygen uptake, performed 15 min after the incremental test (VO(2) (peak) (1)) and on a separate day (VO(2) (peak) (2)). The aim was to determine which of the verification tests is more accurate and, more generally, to validate the VO(2) (max) obtained in the incremental graded test on cycle ergometer. The study involved 23 participants with varying levels of physical activity. Analysis of variance showed no statistically significant differences for repeated measurements (F = 2.28, p = 0.118, η(2) = 0.12). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a small bias of the VO(2) (peak) (1) results compared to the VO(2) (peak) (0.4 ml⋅min(-1)⋅kg(-1)) and VO(2) (peak) (2) results compared to the VO(2) (peak) (-0.76 ml⋅min(-1)⋅kg(-1)). In isolated cases, it was observed that VO(2) (peak) (1) and VO(2) (peak) (2) differed by more than 5% from VO(2) (peak). Considering the above, it can be stated that among young people, there are no statistically significant differences between the values of VO(2peak) measured in the following tests. However, in individual cases, the need to verify the maximum oxygen uptake is stated, but performing a second verification test on a separate day has no additional benefit.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。