Abstract
Perinatal stem cells have prominent applications in cell therapy and regenerative medicine. Among them, human Wharton's jelly mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (hWJMSCs) and human amniotic epithelial stem cells (hAESCs) have been widely used. However, the distinction in the therapeutic potential of hWJMSCs and hAESCs is poorly understood. In this study, we reported the phenotypic differences between these two distinct cell types and provided the first systematic comparison of their therapeutic potential in terms of immunomodulation, extracellular matrix (ECM) remodelling, angiogenesis and antioxidative stress using proteomics. The results revealed that the two cell types presented different protein expression profiles and were both promising candidates for cell therapy. Both types of cells demonstrated angiogenic and antifibrotic potential, whereas hAESCs presented superior immunological tolerance and antioxidant properties, which were supported by a series of relevant in vitro assays. Our study provides clues for the selection of appropriate cell types for diverse indications in cell therapy, which contributes to the advancement of their clinical translation and application.