Dosimetric Comparison of Intraoperative Radiotherapy and SRS for Liver Metastases

肝转移瘤术中放射治疗与立体定向放射外科治疗的剂量学比较

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To perform a dosimetric comparison between kilovoltage intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) simulating both deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and free-breathing (FB) modalities for patients with liver metastases. METHODS/MATERIALS: Diagnostic computed tomographies (CT) of patients carrying one or two lesions <4 cm and who underwent surgery were retrospectively screened and randomly selected for the study. For DIBH-SRS, a gross target volume (GTV) plus planning target volume (PTV) were delineated. For FB-SRS, a GTV plus an internal target volume (ITV) and PTV were defined. Accounting for the maximal GTV diameters, a modified GTV (GTV-IORT) was expanded circumferentially to simulate a resection cavity. The best suitable round-applicator size was thereafter selected. All treatment plans were calculated homogeneously to deliver 40 Gy. Doses delivered to organs at risk (OAR) and target volumes were compared for IORT vs. both SRS modalities. RESULTS: Eight patients encompassing 10 lesions were included in the study. The mean liver volume was 2,050.97 cm(3) (SD, 650.82), and the mean GTV volume was 12.23 cm(3) (SD, 12.62). As for target structures, GTV-IORT [19.44 cm(3) (SD, 17.26)] were significantly smaller than both PTV DIBH-SRS [30.74 cm(3) (SD, 24.64), p = 0.002] and PTV FB-SRS [75.82 cm(3) (SD, 45.65), p = 0.002]. The median applicator size was 3 cm (1.5-4.5), and the mean IORT simulated delivery time was 45.45 min (SD, 19.88). All constraints were met in all modalities. Liver V(9.1) showed significantly smaller volumes with IORT [63.39 cm(3) (SD, 35.67)] when compared to DIBH-SRS [150.12 cm(3) (SD, 81.43), p = 0.002] or FB-SRS [306.13 cm(3) (SD, 128.75), p = 0.002]. No other statistical or dosimetrically relevant difference was observed for stomach, spinal cord, or biliary tract. Mean IORT D(90) was 85.3% (SD, 6.05), whereas D(95) for DIBH-SRS and FB-SRS were 99.03% (SD, 1.71; p = 0.042) and 98.04% (SD, 3.46; p = 0.036), respectively. CONCLUSION: Kilovoltage IORT bears the potential as novel add-on treatment for resectable liver metastases, significantly reducing healthy liver exposure to radiation in comparison to SRS. Prospective clinical evidence is required to confirm this hypothesis.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。