Abstract
The introduction of ultra-sensitive labels for immunoassays has exposed some of the limitations inherent in them. Thus, for instance a major problem with acridinium esters used, as chemiluminescence label is the formation of the so called "pseudobases" at an alkaline pH, which if not suppressed can affect the rate of the chemiluminescence reaction. Chemiluminescence labels such as luminol can also be problematic when attached to antibodies and small molecules to the extent that the sensitivity of the assay can be reduced by the decrease in the intensity of chemiluminescence. The increased use of molecular methods such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and post PCR methods to study mutations have various pittalls, which if unrecognized and uncontrolled can lead to incorrect results and misinterpretation. Patients who are exposed to mouse immunoglobulins through imaging or therapeutic techniques can develop antibodies to mouse immunoglobulins (human anti-mouse antibodies or HAMA) which can be a major problem for non optimized immunoassays using murine monoclonal antibodies. The types of therapy such as anticoagulant used in anticoagulant therapy, blood substitute and drug therapy can impact on the measurements of some of the biochemical and other analytes. One must separate the transient, physiological effects introduced by therapy from long-term biochemical alterations due to disease.