Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To understand the heterogeneous treatment effects of electronic alerts for acute kidney injury (AKI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Secondary analysis of individual patient data from 3 randomized controlled trials. Our outcome measure was 14-day all-cause mortality. Data from the ELAIA-1 trial were used to predict the individualized effect of alerts on mortality based on patients' phenotype. Results were internally validated on a holdout dataset and externally validated using data from 2 additional trials: UPenn and ELAIA-2. We used machine learning-based methods and performed a meta-analysis on individual patient data to identify patient subgroups whose risk of mortality was associated with alerts. In addition, provider actions following alerts were examined to explain how alerts impacted patient mortality. RESULTS: Compared to patients who were predicted to be harmed by an alert, patients predicted to benefit had a lower risk of death in both the internal validation cohort (n = 1809 patients; Pinteraction = .045) and both external validation cohorts (n = 7453 patients; Pinteraction < .0001). In external cohorts, 43 deaths may have been preventable if alerts were restricted to likely beneficiaries. Machine-learning based meta-analysis identified reduced mortality with alerts among patients with higher blood pressures (BP) and lower predicted risk, but increased mortality in non-urban and non-teaching hospitals. Provider responses to alerts differed across subgroups. DISCUSSION: Our findings indicate substantial heterogeneity in the effects of AKI alerts on patient mortality. Tailoring alert delivery based on predicted benefit may mitigate harm and enhance clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Individualizing automated alerts may reduce all-cause mortality. A prospective trial of individualized alerts is needed to confirm these results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02753751 and https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02771977.