Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Pelvic floor disorders are common and burdensome. Data on the effect of induction of labor on pelvic floor disorders are sparse and results are mixed. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate whether elective labor induction in nulliparous women increases the risks of symptomatic urinary incontinence (UI), anal incontinence (AI), or pelvic organ prolapse (POP) 4 years after delivery. STUDY DESIGN: In this single-site follow-up study of "A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management" (ARRIVE) that randomized low-risk nulliparous women with a singleton fetus to elective induction of labor versus expectant management, we compared pelvic floor symptoms between groups at a median of 4 years (interquartile range, 3.5-5.3) after first delivery using validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Seventy hundred sixty-six of 1,042 (74%) original participants responded, and 647 participants (62%) were included in the analysis after exclusions. The overall prevalence rates of symptomatic moderate to severe UI, AI, and POP were 21%, 14%, and 8%, respectively. There were no significant differences in any of the outcomes between women randomized to induction of labor and those to expectant management, either in unadjusted or adjusted analyses. There were also no differences in secondary outcomes, including subtypes of UI or flatal versus stool incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-site study, we found no significant differences in any UI, AI, and POP symptoms between nulliparous women randomized to elective induction of labor and to expectant management; however, for the least frequent outcome (POP), meaningful differences cannot be ruled out.