Abstract
BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgeons who are fellowship-trained in adult reconstruction (AR) specialize specifically in total joint arthroplasty, including total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, TKA procedures are not only performed by AR surgeons. The purpose of this study was to compare the patient demographics and postoperative outcomes of patients who had a TKA procedure performed by an AR surgeon vs a sports medicine (SM) surgeon. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a national insurance database. Patients who underwent a primary elective TKA procedure by an AR surgeon (n = 56,570) and an SM surgeon (n = 72,888) were identified. Patient demographics, rates of joint complications within 2 years, and medical complications within 90 days postoperatively were compared using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Compared to the cohort of patients undergoing TKA by SM surgeons, the patient cohort of AR surgeons had a higher mean Elixhauser comorbidity index (4.2 vs 4.0, P < .001), and had significantly higher rates of several comorbidities. Within 90 days, patients of AR surgeons demonstrated significantly lower rates of acute kidney injury and transfusions. When compared to patients of SM surgeons, patients of AR surgeons demonstrated significantly lower rate of manipulation under anesthesia or lysis of adhesions within 2 years. Rates of all other joint-related complications were statistically comparable between the 2 cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: As a cohort, AR surgeons perform TKA on a higher-risk cohort of patients compared to sports medicine surgeons. Despite the higher-risk patient population, outcomes of TKA by AR surgeons appear equivalent compared to their SM colleagues.