Subjective versus objective tests of dizziness and vestibular function in epidemiologic screening research

流行病学筛查研究中眩晕和前庭功能的主观测试与客观测试

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many epidemiologic studies of vestibular disorders are based on responses to questionnaires which have not been tested against objective tests of the vestibular system. OBJECTIVE: The goal was to determine if the dizziness and balance questions used in the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) are valid and predict performance on objective tests of the vestibular system (VNG). METHODS: Data from 367 participants recruited from the community, aged 21.4 to 87.6 years, were collected in the Otolaryngology department at a tertiary care center. They were asked the eight NHIS questions twice, at least 30 minutes apart and were tested on VNG. RESULTS: Question responses changed from Test 1 to Test 2 and differed between males and females. "Yes" responses did not predict abnormal VNG responses, for the total group and when the group was categorized into younger (<60 years) and older (>60 years) subjects. The sensitivity and specificity of all questions was low. CONCLUSION: The NHIS questions provide some information about what people recall of their experiences, but they may not provide insight into the diagnostic prevalence of vestibular and balance disorders because the sensitivity and specificity are too low. Questionnaire-based epidemiologic studies should be interpreted with caution.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。