Comparative Analysis Between Cortical Bone Trajectory (CBT) Screw Fixation and Traditional Pedicle Screw Fixation in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

腰椎手术中皮质骨轨迹(CBT)螺钉固定与传统椎弓根螺钉固定的比较分析:系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw fixation has been proposed as an alternative method to pedicle screw (PS) fixation for lumbar instrumented fusion. However, the benefits of this technique remain controversial. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Advance, ScienceDirect, Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane databases from inception to July 22, 2023. Articles were included if they were related to adults undergoing lumbar spine surgery and showed comparative outcomes with cortical bone and traditional PS trajectory. Twenty-three studies with 1,929 patients (833 in the CBT group and 1,096 in the PS group) were systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed. Significantly lower complications in the CS group, including adjacent segment degeneration (p < 0.05) and screw loosening (p < 0.05), were found. Superior facet joint violation was significantly less in the CBT group (p < 0.05). The CBT group had reduced hospital stay (p < 0.05), reduced blood loss (p < 0.05), and shorter operations (p < 0.05). Clinical outcomes at a mean of 18 months (standard deviation (SD): six months) favored the CBT group in leg pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores in some subgroups (p < 0.05). Reoperation was significantly reduced in the CBT group (p < 0.05). Our study indicates that CBT fixation has acceptable outcomes relative to PS fixation and may be advantageous in some respects. Further studies are required to ascertain optimal surgical indications for each method.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。