Prognostic Value of Automated Bone Scan Index (aBSI) in Patients with mCRPC Undergoing Three vs. Six Cycles of (223)Ra Therapy

自动骨扫描指数 (aBSI) 在接受 3 个疗程与 6 个疗程 (223)Ra 治疗的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌 (mCRPC) 患者中的预后价值

阅读:1

Abstract

Background/Objectives: In patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and osseous metastases only, (223)Radium therapy represents a valuable therapeutic option. Bone scintigraphy (BS) is typically performed to assess metastasis load, with the BS-derived automated bone scan index (aBSI) used for response assessment. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of aBSI in patients receiving three or six cycles of (223)Ra therapy. Methods: We included patients that were diagnosed with extensive osseous tumor load on BS, had no visceral or nodal metastases, had undergone (223)Ra therapy. The aBSI prior to and following three or six cycles of therapy, total tumor volume (TTV), SUV(max), and overall survival were analyzed. Results: This study included 49 mCRPC patients (mean age: 70 ± 9 years) with 42 (85.7%) receiving six and 7 (14.3%) receiving three cycles. After three cycles, the mean aBSI (p = 0.369), TTV (p = 0.902), and SUV(max) (p = 0.149) remained unchanged. After six cycles, the mean aBSI (p = 0.247) and TTV (p = 0.784) were unchanged, while SUV(max) decreased significantly (p = 0.001). The aBSI did not significantly correlate with the mean aBSI (six cycles: χ(2) = 1.823, p = 0.177; three cycles: χ(2) = 0.308, p = 0.579). Conclusions: Although quantitative changes in TTV and aBSI did not significantly correlate with each other, their respective absolute values consistently indicated stable disease burden under therapy. This highlights its potential as a useful tool for monitoring disease burden while indicating that aBSI alone is insufficient for predicting overall survival.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。