[Implications of a general practitioner gatekeeping system in Germany]

[德国全科医生把关制度的影响]

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory healthcare in Germany is under pressure due to the increasing need for care, medical progress and a shortage of specialist personnel. Making general practitioners mandatory gatekeepers is on the political agenda aiming at more targeted use of specialist care and improved quality of care. OBJECTIVE: The study investigated how many persons in the statutory health insurance (SHI) currently consult specialists or psychotherapists without a referral and what additional burden a primary care system would place on general practitioners if these cases also had to be managed by them. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on nationwide physician billing data for all SHI patients in 2023, cases of adult SHI patients were selected in which a general practitioner contact fee ("hausärztliche Versichertenpauschale, VP") or a specialist or psychotherapeutic contact fee ("fachärztliche/psychotherapeutische Grundpauschale, GP") was claimed. Specialist or psychotherapy cases without a documented referral were considered as potentially uncontrolled. Various scenarios were considered to calculate the potential additional burden resulting from increased general practitioner control. RESULTS: Out of 59 million insured adults 33.2 million visited a specialist or psychotherapist at least once without a documented referral. This was associated with 17-102 million potentially uncontrolled specialist or psychotherapy cases. If these had to be additionally managed by general practitioner in a gatekeeper system, this would imply approximately 335-2000 additional contacts per general practitioner per year, depending on the scenario. CONCLUSION: The actual additional burden on general practitioner depends largely on the specific design of the primary care system. A moderate additional burden is likely and the decisive factor is a binding of patients for longer periods to the chosen primary care practice.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。