Establishment and evaluation of a carotid artery dissection model in rats

大鼠颈动脉夹层模型的建立及评价

阅读:4
作者:Shufan Zhang #, Zhenxiang Han #, Ying Cao #, Weicheng Wu, Yuanzeng Liu, Shilin Yang, Xiaochao Feng, Chun Yu, Zhu Zhu, Qiang Dong, Xiang Han

Background

Given the lack of models for carotid artery dissections (CAD), we

Conclusion

The animal model of CAD can be feasible to establish by mechanical torsion combined with BAPN free drinking. With this method, the animal mortality was low and the model formation rate was high. This model will enable further studies on CAD.

Methods

Sixteen SPF SD rats (3-week-old) were divided into two groups. Group B was given 0.25% BAPN solution and group W was given water. Then we established an animal model of CAD by carotid artery torsion. One of the two carotid arteries in each rat was randomly selected for torsion. We got four groups of blood vessels following above-mentioned methods: BAPN plus torsion group (group Bt), BAPN plus non-torsion group (group Bn), water plus torsion group (group Wt), and water plus non-torsion group (group Wn). The hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining and Verhoeff's Van Gieson (EVG) staining were performed to observe structures of arteries. Immunofluorescence staining was used to detect structural proteins in vessels. We used triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining and neurological function assessment to detect the infarct area of brain and neurological deficits in rats with carotid dissection to verify the validity of the rat model.

Results

BAPN treatment significantly affected the weight gain of rats, but had little effect on survival during the first 5 weeks. The group Bt had the highest incidence of CAD among all groups (p = 0.014). HE staining of carotid artery tissue sections showed that the vascular walls were the thickest in group Bt (p < 0.001). EVG staining showed the arrangement of elastic fibers was the most irregular in group Bt. Immunofluorescence staining revealed that the expression of a-SMA and SM22a were decreased remarkably in group Bt (p < 0.001). Both motor and sensory deficits were more severe in CAD group than control group (p = 0.0004; p = 0.0036). The relative infarction volumes of CAD group rats were significantly larger than control group (p < 0.001).

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。