Abstract
Training models with semi- or self-supervised learning methods is one way to reduce annotation effort since they rely on unlabeled or sparsely labeled datasets. Such approaches are particularly promising for domains with a time-consuming annotation process requiring specialized expertise and where high-quality labeled machine learning datasets are scarce, like in computational pathology. Even though some of these methods have been used in the histopathological domain, there is, so far, no comprehensive study comparing different approaches. Therefore, this work compares feature extractors models trained with state-of-the-art semi- or self-supervised learning methods PAWS, SimCLR, and SimSiam within a unified framework. We show that such models, across different architectures and network configurations, have a positive performance impact on histopathological classification tasks, even in low data regimes. Moreover, our observations suggest that features learned from a particular dataset, i.e., tissue type, are only in-domain transferable to a certain extent. Finally, we share our experience using each method in computational pathology and provide recommendations for its use.