An in-vitro assessment of the irrigants and irrigation protocols effect on the ProRoot MTA marginal leakage in the furcal perforations

体外评估冲洗剂和冲洗方案对ProRoot MTA根分叉穿孔边缘渗漏的影响

阅读:2

Abstract

To assess the effects of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), individually and in combination, as part of an irrigation protocol on furcal perforations treated with ProRoot MTA, using the dye extraction (DE) method for evaluation. Sixty intact mandibular molars were used. Perforations were created with a 1.2 mm diameter at the FA of the molars and sealed the perforations with MTA. Then the samples were divided randomly after to six groups according to the irrigant used: Group 1 (n = 10), 5.25% NaOCl; Group 2 (n = 10), 17% EDTA; Group 3 (n = 10), 2% CHX, Group 4 (n = 10), saline serum (control group); Group 5 (n = 10), (5.25% NaOCl,17% EDTA, 5.25% NaOCl) protocol replaced with saline serum between each irrigant; and Group 6 (n = 10), (5.25% NaOCl, 17% EDTA, 2% CHX). Specimens were immersed for 24 h in 2% methylene blue. Subsequently, a DE test was performed. Data analysis employed the One-Way ANOVA and LSD tests. The significance level was set at 0.05. DE values between groups revealed significant differences in this study (p < 0.01). Control group DE values were less than NaOCl (p < 0.05), EDTA (p < 0.01), CHX (p < 0.01), protocol (NaOCl - EDTA - NaOCl) (p < 0.01), and protocol (NaOCl - EDTA - CHX) (p < 0.01) groups, proposing the order: Control group < NaOCl < EDTA < CHX≤(NaOCl - EDTA - NaOCl) protocol≤(NaOCl - EDTA - CHX) protocol. Deterioration of the MTA sealing ability was noted when contacted with 5.25% NaOCl, 17% EDTA, 2% CHX, and both protocols.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。