Clinical significance of BRAF non-V600E mutations on the therapeutic effects of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody treatment in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the Biomarker Research for anti-EGFR monoclonal Antibodies by Comprehensive Cancer genomics (BREAC) study

BRAF非V600E突变对既往接受过治疗的转移性结直肠癌患者抗EGFR单克隆抗体治疗效果的临床意义:基于综合癌症基因组学的抗EGFR单克隆抗体生物标志物研究(BREAC)

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with BRAF(V600E)-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have a poorer prognosis as well as resistance to anti-EGFR antibodies. However, it is unclear whether BRAF mutations other than BRAF(V600E) (BRAF(non-V600E) mutations) contribute to anti-EGFR antibody resistance. METHODS: This study was composed of exploratory and inference cohorts. Candidate biomarkers identified by whole exome sequencing from super-responders and nonresponders in the exploratory cohort were validated by targeted resequencing for patients who received anti-EGFR antibody in the inference cohort. RESULTS: In the exploratory cohort, 31 candidate biomarkers, including KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutations, were identified. Targeted resequencing of 150 patients in the inference cohort revealed 40 patients with RAS (26.7%), 9 patients with BRAF(V600E) (6.0%), and 7 patients with BRAF(non-V600E) mutations (4.7%), respectively. The response rates in RAS, BRAF(V600E), and BRAF(non-V600E) were lower than those in RAS/BRAF wild-type (2.5%, 0%, and 0% vs 31.9%). The median PFS in BRAF(non-V600E) mutations was 2.4 months, similar to that in RAS or BRAF(V600E) mutations (2.1 and 1.6 months) but significantly worse than that in wild-type RAS/BRAF (5.9 months). CONCLUSIONS: Although BRAF(non-V600E) mutations identified were a rare and unestablished molecular subtype, certain BRAF(non-V600E) mutations might contribute to a lesser benefit of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody treatment.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。