Abstract
OBJECTIVE: There are no reports from Japan showing the effects of using the thromboelastography algorithm on transfusion requirements after Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, and post-implementation knowledge regarding the thromboelastography algorithm under the Japanese healthcare system is insufficient. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the effect of the TEG6s thromboelastography algorithm on transfusion requirements for patients in the ICU after cardiac surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively compared the requirements for blood transfusion up to 24 h after ICU admission using the thromboelastography algorithm (January 2021 to April 2022) (thromboelastography group; n = 201) and specialist consultation with surgeons and anesthesiologists (January 2018 to December 2020) (non-thromboelastography group; n = 494). RESULTS: There were no significant between-group differences in terms of age, height, weight, body mass index, operative procedure, duration of surgery or cardiopulmonary bypass, body temperature, or urine volume during surgical intervention. Moreover, there was no significant between-group difference in the amount of drainage at 24 h after ICU admission. However, crystalloid and urine volumes were significantly higher in the thromboelastography group than in the non-thromboelastography group. Additionally, fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion volumes were significantly lower in the thromboelastography group. However, there were no significant between-group differences in red blood cell count or platelet transfusion volume. After variable adjustment, the amount of FFP used from the operating room to 24 h after ICU admission was significantly reduced in the thromboelastography group. CONCLUSIONS: The thromboelastography algorithm optimized transfusion requirements at 24 h after admission to the ICU following cardiac surgery.