Abstract
The type of fixative used for preserving tumor specimens can significantly impact the performance of the immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization assays used for assessing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status. This study reports the prevalence of the use of alternative fixatives other than the guideline-recommended 10% neutral buffered formalin (NBF) during HER2 testing in a real-world setting. The effects of alternative fixatives [20% NBF and 10% unbuffered formalin (UBF) fixatives] on HER2 testing of breast cancer (BC) and gastric cancer (GC) cell lines and tissues are also assessed. Overall, 117,636 tumor samples received at a central laboratory from >8000 clinical trial sites across 60 countries were reviewed to determine the prevalence of alternative fixative usage. To investigate the impact of alternative fixatives, 27 cell lines (21 BC and 6 GC) and 76 tumor tissue samples (50 BC and 26 GC) were fixed in 10% NBF, 20% NBF, or 10% UBF, and evaluated for HER2 status by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. Real-world data showed that 9195 (7.8%) tumor samples were preserved using an alternative fixative. In cell lines, overall percentage agreement, negative percentage agreement, and positive percentage agreement among the 3 fixatives were 100%. In tumor tissues, the agreement among 10% NBF, 20% NBF, and 10% UBF ranged between 94.7% and 96.6% for negative percentage agreement and 90.9% for overall percentage agreement compared with a range of 58.3% to 66.7% for positive percentage agreement. These results suggest that alternative fixatives may have the potential to convert HER2 status in tissues from positive to negative.