Abstract
The superficial and middle temporal veins (STV and MTV) have been used as recipient veins for free-flap reconstruction; however, the STV is sometimes small and cannot be used, while the MTV is not fully recognized or utilized as a recipient vein. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the reliability of the STV/MTV as recipient veins and to verify the utility and availability of the MTV by comparing the two veins. Thirty-five consecutive cases of free-flap reconstruction utilizing recipient vessels in the temporal region were retrospectively reviewed. Regarding recipient veins, the STV was the only option in the first 18 cases; the MTV was included among the options in the latter 17 cases. The calibers of the STV/MTV were evaluated at two level points (1: zygomatic arch, 2: palpebral fissure) using the results of preoperative dynamic-enhanced computed tomography (CT). Two cases of severe venous congestion were identified among the first 18 patients. After the adoption of the MTV, the MTV was used in 10 of the 17 cases, and no vascular complication occurred. On CT imaging evaluation, the caliber of the MTV (Point 2) (2.94 ± 0.55 mm) was significantly larger than the calibers of the STV (Point 1) (2.40 ± 0.48 mm) and MTV (Point 1) (2.49 ± 0.43 mm) (both P < 0.001). Regarding the recipient veins in the temporal area, the MTV can offer an option with a larger caliber or for additional venous anastomosis when the condition of the STV is inadequate.