Abstract
BACKGROUND: One of the modes of transmission of HIV infection in India is from mother-to-child. In 2014, Prevention of Parent-to-child Transmission (PPTCT) guidelines of HIV in India were implemented which included shifting from Option A to Option B and B+. The aim of the present study was to evaluate health and cost related outcomes after implementation of these new guidelines. METHODS: A decision analytical model was used to compare the PPTCT Option A with the new WHO Option of B and B+. Transmissions in serodiscordant couples and infants at 18 months were considered as health outcomes. The estimation of the cost for PPTCT services and HIV treatment was done using Costing Tool for Elimination Initiatives (CTEI) developed by National Center for Global Health and Medicine (NCGM). RESULTS: The reduction in transmission rates in HIV infants was 33%. In serodiscordant couples the reduction in risk of HIV transmission from Option A to Option B and B+ was 72% and 87%, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality adjusted life years (QALY) gained by averting infant infection, and for both infant and partner was US$ 238 and US$ 181 for Option B and US$ 1265 and US$ 947 for Option B+, respectively. CONCLUSION: It was found that Options B and B+ are more cost-effective as compared to option A. This effectiveness further increases when prevention of partner infections in Option B and B+ is taken into account.