Comparison of clipping and endoscopic band ligation treatment for the colonic wall: an in vivo animal study

结肠壁夹闭术与内镜下套扎术治疗的比较:一项体内动物研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although clipping is a simple and widely used treatment for colonic diverticular bleeding, endoscopic band ligation (EBL) has recently been reported to be more effective than clipping in preventing recurrent bleeding. However, the pathologic effects of these treatments on the colonic mucosa remain unclear. This study compares the effects of those treatments on the colonic mucosa using a pig model. METHODS: Six clipping procedures and 6 EBL procedures each were performed on the normal colon of the pig, with the clipping and EBL sites separated by approximately 1 cm. The procedure was performed by an expert endoscopist. The pig was killed 10 days after the procedures, and the specimens were compared for pathologic evaluation of necrosis, fibrosis, and disruption of the muscularis mucosae of the colonic mucosa to determine the effects on the colonic mucosa. RESULTS: All bands and clips remained in the procedure site; no perforation was observed at either site. Necrosis was significantly less in the clip group (P = .002). Disruption of the muscularis mucosae was less common in the clip group, but the difference was not significant (P = .181). Fibrosis of the submucosa was less in the clip group (0 of 6) than in the EBL group (6 of 6) (P = .002). Fibrosis extending to the serosa was less in the clip group but was not statistically significant: 0 (0%) in the clip group and 4 (66.7%) in the EBL group (P = .061). CONCLUSIONS: The impact on the colonic mucosa is small and localized with clipping but large and extensive with EBL.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。