Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare two blind source separation (BSS) techniques to principal component analysis and the electrocardiogram for the identification of cardiac triggers in self-gated free-running 5D whole-heart MRI. To ascertain the precision and robustness of the techniques, they were compared in three different noise and contrast regimes. METHODS: The repeated superior-inferior (SI) projections of a 3D radial trajectory were used to extract the physiological signals in three cardiac MRI cohorts: (1) 9 healthy volunteers without contrast agent injection at 1.5T, (2) 30 ferumoxytol-injected congenital heart disease patients at 1.5T, and (3) 12 gadobutrol-injected patients with suspected coronary artery disease at 3T. Self-gated cardiac triggers were extracted with the three algorithms (principal component analysis [PCA], second-order blind identification [SOBI], and independent component analysis [ICA]) and the difference with the electrocardiogram triggers was calculated. PCA and SOBI triggers were retained for image reconstruction. The image sharpness was ascertained on whole-heart 5D images obtained with PCA and SOBI and compared among the three cohorts. RESULTS: SOBI resulted in smaller trigger differences in Cohorts 1 and 3 compared to PCA (p < 0.01) and in all cohorts compared to ICA (p < 0.04). In Cohorts 1 and 3, the sharpness increased significantly in the reconstructed images when using SOBI instead of PCA (p < 0.03), but not in Cohort 2 (p = 0.4). CONCLUSION: We have shown that SOBI results in more precisely extracted self-gated triggers than PCA and ICA. The validation across three diverse cohorts demonstrates the robustness of the method against acquisition variability.