Abstract
The Achilles heel of plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) is neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) and restenosis, caused from the barotrauma of ballooning. Drug-coated balloons using a paclitaxel-based platform (PCB) have been shown to retard the restenotic process, using the anti-proliferative effects of paclitaxel, and give longer vessel patency. This is important in the setting of chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) and for the protracted wound healing process in these frail patients. However, during PCB application, more than 50% of the drug is lost downstream, a phenomenon termed particulate embolization. This is thought to account for the slow- or no-flow phenomenon encountered after PCB use. Recent data suggest that slow-flow phenomenon was associated with a lower target lesion revascularisation rate and worse amputation free survival (AFS). The use of sirolimus coated balloons (SCB) to impede the NIH cascade has been less well studied but recent data suggested excellent short-term efficacy and found no slow flow phenomenon with their use in the tibial arteries in CLTI patients. Aim of this case series is to highlight the difference in flow phenomena using PCB and SCB elution in the setting of CLTI. We evaluated the use of parametric colour coding and time attenuation curves (TAC) as a quantitative measure of blood flow. SCB may have an advantage over PCB use in the peripheral vasculature because of a reduced incidence of slow flow phenomenon following drug elution.