Abstract
QT interval in an electrocardiogram (ECG) is interpreted after correction (QTc) by various formulas. This study aimed to compare the QTcs calculated by nine formulas. Sinus rhythm ECG reports of 1140 anonymous subjects showed uncorrected QT interval of 388.49 ± 42.74 ms. The QTc calculated by Bazett (443.96 ± 57.58 ms), Fridericia (424.37 ± 50.1 ms), Dmitrienko (433.59 ± 53.37 ms), Framingham (422.59 ± 45.55 ms), Schlamowitz (433.89 ± 48.05 ms), Hodges (421.6 ± 46.4 ms), Ashman (434.33 ± 54.05 ms), Rautaharju (427.75 ± 47.4 ms), and Sarma (429.22 ± 48.67 ms) showed a significant difference F (8, 10251) = 22.78 p < 0.0001. Hence, ECG should contain the formula for proper reporting and ease of interpretation by clinicians.