Abstract
AIMS: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the treatment of choice of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). However, radiofrequency delivery at extra-PV sites may be additionally required. We compared clinical and procedural characteristics of patients undergoing PVI alone versus adjunctive extra-PV substrate modification, at first procedure and repeat procedures for AF recurrence. METHODS: 587 patients with PAF undergoing radiofrequency (RF) ablation were retrospectively included. Extra-PV ablation was performed in case of sustained AF despite PVI, or at re-do procedures without PV conduction recovery. Demographic, clinical and electrophysiological predictors of survival without re-intervention were analysed in patients' groups having undergone one (G1), two (G2) or three or more procedures (G3). RESULTS: At baseline procedure, PV RF ablation time was shorter in G1 compared to G2/G3 whereas extra-PV RF ablation time was greater in G3 compared to G1. The proportion of patients requiring PV re-isolation decreased with repeat procedures. Smaller LA before procedure 1 (p1) or p2 was associated with PV reconnection at p2. Conversely larger LA before p1 was associated with extra-PV substrate modification at p2. Late re-do procedure timing (>1yr) was associated with increasing LA volume. Only longer PV and total RF time predicted poorer survival free from AF without re-intervention. CONCLUSION: Longer PV RF time predicted requirement for re-ablation during follow-up. Smaller LA size predicted an increased probability of PV reconnection and decreased extra-PV substrate modification at p2. LA size decreased in patients undergoing early re-intervention, whereas it increased in patients undergoing re-intervention later on suggesting ongoing remodelling or progression.