Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Though invasive monitoring is the most accurate to estimate diastolic dysfunction but it has its own risk. The purpose of this study was to find out any standardized correlation between invasive and non -invasive parameters. METHODS: It is an observational, descriptive study comprising of a total of 500 patients. The primary objective of the study was to determine the correlation between echocardiographic diastolic parameters and invasively measured left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP). RESULTS: On studying correlation of different invasive and non-invasive data it was reported that there was a weak correlation between peak E velocity (r = 0.14, p = 0.631), Peak A velocity (r = 0.67, p = 0.59), IVRT (r = -0.35, p = 0.178), Mitral deceleration time (DT) (r = -0.06, p = 0.842), pulmonary venous peak systolic (r = -0.02, p = 0.966) and diastolic flows (r = 0.47, p = 0.201) to LVEDP. There was a good positive correlation between elevated LVEDP and difference in duration of pulmonary venous and mitral flow at atrial contraction (A-Ard) and E/Ea at all four longitudinal segments of the left ventricle. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting an elevated LVEDP of more than 12 mm Hg, using a cut off value of E/Ea< 8, were 89% and 90%.Lateral E/Ea ≥ 12, LAVI ≥34 mL/m2, and Ard-Ad > 30 msec have the greatest diagnostic value for diagnosing diastolic dysfunction in HFpEF patients. CONCLUSION: Lateral E/Ea ≥ 12, LAVI ≥34 mL/m2, and Ard-Ad > 30 msec have the greatest diagnostic value for diagnosing diastolic dysfunction in HFpEF patients and have good correlation with invasively measured LVEDP.