Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) have become a common treatment modality in clinical practice. The increase in utilization of these devices has been associated with an increase in infection rates. Published guidelines define when a device is deemed infected (CDI); recommendations for the work-up of CDI and criteria for extraction. Few data exist as to adherence to these guidelines. OBJECTIVE: We wanted to o evaluate whether devices diagnosed as CDI fit guidelines, whether clinicians followed work-up recommendation of CDI, and whether CIED was extracted according to the guidelines criteria in our hospital. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed in our hospital between 2008 and 2017. Adult patients (pts) 18 years and older who had their device extracted (DE) with a diagnosis of CDI were included. A total of 95 pts were identified. RESULTS: We included 95 pts who were diagnosed as having CDI and who had their DE. Work-up of patients with a diagnosis of CDI was inconsistently followed. Blood cultures, Echocardiogram, lead cultures (LC), and device pocket cultures (PC) were done in 100%, 90.5%, 75.6%, and 49.3%, respectively. Thirty out of 90 pts. (33%) did not meet guidelines criteria for extraction. CONCLUSIONS: In our institution, a one third of the pts diagnosed with CDI who had DE had no indication for DE per guidelines recommendations. Clinicians did not follow recommendations for work-up of CDI consistently. Low adherence was seen in obtaining LC and PC. CIED extraction guidelines should be followed to prevent unnecessary complications and cost.