Meta-analysis of ultrasound-guided vs conventional vascular access for cardiac electrophysiology procedures

超声引导与传统血管入路在心脏电生理手术中的应用:荟萃分析

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vascular complications are common during invasive cardiac electrophysiology procedures. This meta-analysis compares outcomes following ultrasound and nonultrasound-guided vascular access for these procedures. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane 01/01/1980-30/09/2018 were searched for relevant studies to meta-analyse. RESULTS: Seven studies (6269 patients) were included. Pooled rates and odds ratio(95% confidence interval) for ultrasound and nonultrasound subgroups were 1.2% vs 3.0%, 0.32 (0.21-0.49) for all vascular complications, with less hematomas and arterial punctures but similar arteriovenous fistulas, pseudoaneurysms or retroperitoneal bleeds. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound guidance had less complications due to less hematoma and arterial puncture, and is generally recommended for electrophysiology procedures.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。