Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of adenosine-mediated dormant pulmonary vein conduction, and whether such dormant conduction should be eliminated, remains controversial. We sought to perform a meta-analysis of data from eligible studies to delineate the prognostic impact of adenosine-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using online databases in order to identify relevant studies from January 2004 to September 2016. Ten studies [six observational and four randomized control trials (RCTs)] were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Five studies (two observational and three RCTs) compared the efficacy of adenosine-mediated elimination of dormant conduction versus no adenosine test. Overall, the adenosine-guided ablation strategy displayed better long-term outcomes as compared with no adenosine testing (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.14, p=0.02; Heterogeneity: I(2)=42%, p: 0.14). The meta-analysis of only RCTs failed to show any differences between the two strategies (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.96-1.11, p=0.37; Heterogeneity: I(2) 0%, p: 0.41). Eight studies (five observational and three RCTs) addressed the efficacy of adenosine-induced dormant conduction and additional ablation versus no dormant conduction during adenosine challenge. Overall, a trend towards a better outcome in those without dormant conduction during drug challenge was noted (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.77-1.03, p=0.11; Heterogeneity: I(2) 65% p: 0.006). The pooled analysis of RCTs failed to show any differences between the two arms (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.62-1.30, p= 0.57; Heterogeneity: I(2) 88%, p: 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Adenosine-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation does not provide additional benefit in terms of freedom of arrhythmia recurrence.