Associations Between Fear-Avoidance or Pain Catastrophizing and Gait Quality in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study

慢性腰痛患者恐惧回避或疼痛灾难化思维与步态质量之间的关联:一项横断面研究

阅读:2

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is associated with reduced gait speed and other gait quality impairments. Fear-avoidance and pain catastrophizing impact movement in cLBP, but their specific impact on gait quality is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine associations between fear-avoidance or pain catastrophizing and gait quality in cLBP. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study. SETTING: This study occurred at a university. PARTICIPANTS: There were 500 individuals (56.6 [SD = 16.5] years old; 311 female) with cLBP. INTERVENTIONS: Participants completed the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire - Physical Activity (FABQ-PA) and 6-item Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Participants were divided into high and low fear-avoidance subgroups based on an established FABQ-PA cutoff (>14). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Gait speed was measured during a 4-meter walk test, while step time average, step time variability, and symmetry were derived from a lumbar inertial measurement unit worn during a 2-minute walk test. Multiple linear regression models were used to determine relationships between fear-avoidance or pain catastrophizing and gait quality. T tests were used to determine gait quality differences between high versus low fear-avoidance subgroups. RESULTS: High fear-avoidance was associated with reduced gait speed (B = -0.0039), but pain catastrophizing was not. The high fear-avoidance subgroup had slower gait speed (mean difference = 0.05 m/s), longer step time (mean difference = 0.02 s), and higher step time variability (mean difference = 0.004 s) compared to the low fear-avoidance subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Fear-avoidance is associated with slower gait speeds, even after adjusting for demographics, pain, and disability. The established FABQ-PA cutoff is robust in detecting gait differences between high versus low fear-avoidance subgroups. RELEVANCE: It may be important to consider fear-avoidance in the delivery of multi-modal interventions to address gait impairments. Future studies are needed to determine the impact of addressing fear-avoidance alongside traditional gait interventions in cLBP.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。