Abstract
BACKGROUND: Health Economic Evaluations (HEEs) provide the necessary evidence of cost-benefit to inform policy and investment decisions. No HEEs have quantified the cost-benefit of passive suction (PS) vs vacuum assisted suction (VAS) suspension for trans-tibial prosthesis users. There are methodological challenges to conducting HEE in prosthetics given the benefit measures are not focused on the things most important to prosthesis users and funders, and the required time horizons are lengthy. To address these challenges, we propose a pilot study using two PROMIS instruments to measure benefits and trial the use of a Synthetic Cohort Method, to quantify the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of PS and VAS suspension for people living with trans-tibial amputation. METHODS: An observational study will measure the costs and benefits of PS and VAS suspension for trans-tibial prosthesis users using a Synthetic Cohort Method, a technique used in epidemiological modelling of life-time risks. Each intervention will include 3 sub-groups, representing prosthesis users in the first, second, or third year of the intervention since fitting. A prosthetic payor perspective will be taken, with data collected over a 1-year period and synthesised to reflect the costs and benefits over a 3-year time horizon. Benefits will be measured using two PROMIS instruments reported to best measure the benefits most important to prosthesis users and funders. Costs will be calculated from actual billable costs to the funder. Costs and benefits will be discounted at 4%. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility will be calculated using the incremental costs and incremental benefits, with results presented as incremental cost-effectiveness and incremental cost-utility ratios. Bootstrapping will be undertaken to assess uncertainty, and discounting will be analysed through a one-way sensitivity analysis. DISCUSSION: This pilot will make a novel contribution by trailing the use of a Synthetic Cohort Method to reduce the lengthy time horizons required in prosthetic HEE. The HEE will use a two-pronged approach whereby cost-utility and cost-effectiveness are simultaneously evaluated using the PROMIS instruments to inform a wide range of policy and investment decisions. Additionally, this pilot will be the first HEE of suction suspension systems for people with transtibial amputation and will therefore make an important contribution to the prosthetic evidence base.