Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome

比较 (18)F-FDG PET/CT 和 (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT 在异位促肾上腺皮质激素综合征诊断中的效能

阅读:2

Abstract

PURPOSE: Fluorine-18 ((18)F)-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and gallium-68 ((68)Ga)-somatostatin analog (SSA) PET/CT imaging have been increasingly used in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome (EAS); however, the diagnostic efficacies of these two methods in patients with EAS remain unclear. Our study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacies of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in EAS. METHODS: The clinical and imaging data of 68 patients with EAS who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT examinations from December 2016 to April 2021 were analyzed retrospectively, and the diagnostic efficacies of these methods were compared. RESULTS: In 37 cases, imaging was performed to locate the primary tumor lesion (localization group), and in 31 to evaluate tumor load or metastasis (staging group). Primary tumors were detected in 48.65% (18/37) of the localization group patients. According to scan-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates of (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging and (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 18.92% vs. 45.95% (p < 0.05) and 21.62% vs. 2.70% (p < 0.05) respectively. For lesion-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates were 24.13% vs. 58.62% (p >0.05) and 31.04% vs. 3.45% (p < 0.05). In 90.32% (28/31) of the staging group patients, 286 of 292 lesions were confirmed as tumor lesions. Based on scan analysis, the detection rates and false positive rates of (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging and (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 83.87% vs. 67.74% (p > 0.05) and 12.90% vs. 9.68% (p > 0.05) respectively. Based on lesion analysis, the detection rate and false positive rates were 93.84% vs. 54.80% (p < 0.05) and 1.37% vs. 1.03%(p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging may be more suitable than (18)F-FDG PET/CT for identifying the primary tumor in patients with EAS, while (18)F-FDG PET/CT may be more advantageous than (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for patients with suspected metastasis.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。