Abstract
While foraging tunnels of the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, have been well studied, much less is known about the tunnels constructed between neighboring nests, despite their perceived importance in intra-colony exchange and collaboration. In this study, we investigated such tunnels by excavating 80 pairs of nests (with distances of <1 m between nests) located in different types of habitats. For each pair of nests, we recorded the number of inter-nest tunnels and observed their shape, diameter, subsurface depth, and ant presence within them. Moreover, we analyzed the relationships between the probability of constructing inter-nest tunnels and several nest/habitat characteristics, including distance between nests, colony social form, nest size, soil type, and vegetation cover, as well as the relationships between tunnel numbers and these factors. The results show that the number of inter-nest tunnels ranges from one to 11. These tunnels open to the two nests at terminals, are elliptical in cross-section, <1.5 cm in diameter, and mostly at 1-3 cm (range 1-12 cm) subsurface depth. Among the 36 pairs of nests possessing tunnels, 31 pairs (86.1%) had worker or alate ants within their tunnels. Polygynous colonies are more likely (52.4%) to construct inter-nest tunnels than monogynous colonies (17.6%). Nest pairs that have a small nest, located in habitats with higher vegetation cover and loamy or sandy loam soil, tend to have inter-nest tunnels. We also showed that the capacity of constructing inter-nest tunnels falls in the regime similar to foraging tunnels. As nests were treated with chemicals, 33 nests were relocated and 47 new nests resulted within 2 weeks, but no definite tunnels were constructed between original nests and corresponding new nests. Our results highlight the significance of including such tunnels when analyzing intra-colony exchange, collaboration, and adaptive strategies in S. invicta. Uses of tunnels by fire ants during nest relocation, and the requirement of destroying them during control program implementation, were discussed.