Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Thyroid nodules are extremely common, with prevalence rate up to 68%, yet only 7-15% of these are malignant. Many nodules require surveillance and 2-dimensional ultrasound (2D US) is used. Issues include the huge workload of obtaining and labeling images and difficulty comparing sizes of nodules over time due to large inter-operator variability. Inaccuracies may result in unnecessary FNAC or missed diagnosis of malignant nodules. METHODS: We compared two techniques: freehand plain 2D US against freehand 2D US with gyroscopic guidance, both followed by 3D reconstruction using software. We measured the volume of nodules and a normal thyroid gland. RESULTS: We found 2D US with gyroscopic guidance to be superior to plain 2D US as 3D reconstructions of greater accuracy are produced. The volume of the thyroid lobe measured 8.42 cm(3) ± 0.94 was reasonably close to the normal average volume. However, the measured volume of the ellipsoidal nodule by the software is 8.69 cm(3) ± 0.97 while the measured volume of the spherical nodule is 7.09 cm(3) ± 0.79. As the expected volume of the nodules were 4.24cm(3) and 4.19 cm(3) respectively, the measured volume of the nodule was not accurate. The time taken to characterise nodules was reduced greatly from over 30 min in usual procedure to less than 10 min. CONCLUSION: We find 3D US promising for evaluating size of thyroid nodules, with potential to study other TIRAD characteristics. Freehand 2D US with gyroscopic guidance shows the most promise for producing reliable, accurate and faster 3D reconstructions of thyroid nodules.