Abstract
Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial biopsy (TBB) is a common procedure used to diagnose peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). However, existing literature did not conclusively show a difference in the ability of EBUS-TBB with and without a guide sheath (GS) to diagnose PPLs. This multicenter cohort study enrolled patients presenting for EBUS-TBB of PPLs that finally proved to be malignant. The diagnostic yield and complication rate were compared between patients undergoing EBUS-TBB with and without a GS (EBUS-TBB+GS versus EBUS-TBB-GS). A propensity score matching method was used to balance differences of pertinent clinical features between the two groups. The original cohort consisted of 975 patients (556 in EBUS-TBB-GS; 419 in EBUS-TBB+GS). GS guidance was more likely to be used with smaller (40 mm versus 44 mm) and middle or lower lobe (60% versus 35%) lesions. After propensity score matching, 720 (360 in each group) patients were included; the diagnostic yields for PPLs were 79% and 78% for EBUS-TBB-GS and EBUS-TBB+GS groups, respectively (p=0.649). The complication rates (5.8% versus 7.2% for bleeding; 0.6% versus 1.9% for pneumothorax) appeared to be lower in the EBUS-TBB+GS group, but the differences did not reach statistical significance. The procedure time was significantly longer in the EBUS-TBB+GS group than in the EBUS-TBB-GS group (29 min versus 24 min; p<0.001). In conclusion, adding a GS to EBUS-TBB did not improve the diagnostic yield for malignant PPLs. GS guidance was seemingly associated with a lower number of complications after TBB but contributed significantly to a longer procedure time.