Abstract
Auranofin, a gold(I)-based complex, is under clinical trials for application as an anticancer agent for the treatment of nonsmall-cell lung cancer and ovarian cancer. In the past years, different derivatives have been developed, modifying gold linear ligands in the search for new gold complexes endowed with a better pharmacological profile. Recently, a panel of four gold(I) complexes, inspired by the clinically established compound auranofin, was reported by our research group. As described, all compounds possess an [Au{P(OMe)(3)}](+) cationic moiety, in which the triethylphosphine of the parent compound auranofin was replaced with an oxygen-rich trimethylphosphite ligand. The gold(I) linear coordination geometry was complemented by Cl(-), Br(-), I(-), and the auranofin-like thioglucose tetraacetate ligand. As previously reported, despite their close similarity to auranofin, the panel compounds exhibited some peculiar and distinctive features, such as lower log P values which can induce relevant differences in the overall pharmacokinetic profiles. To get better insight into the P-Au strength and stability, an extensive study was carried out for relevant biological models, including three different vasopressin peptide analogues and cysteine, using (31)P NMR and LC-ESI-MS. A DFT computational study was also carried out for a better understanding of the theoretical fundamentals of the disclosed differences with regard to triethylphosphine parent compounds.