Conclusion
The current investigation of intraperitoneal therapy with 211At-farletuzumab, delivered at clinically relevant 211At-mAb radioactivity concentrations and specific activities, showed a 6 to 10-fold increase (treated versus controls) in antitumor efficacy. This observation warrants further clinical testing.
Methods
For biodistribution, using intravenous injections and mice carrying subcutaneous (s.c.) tumors, the animals were administered either 211At-farletuzumab (n = 16); or with a combination of 125I-farletuzumab and 211At-MX35 (n = 12). At 1, 3, 10 and 22 h, mice were euthanized and s.c.-tumors and organs weighted and measured for radioactivity. To evaluate therapeutic efficacy, mice were inoculated i.p. with 2 × 106 NIH:OVCAR-3 cells. Twelve days later, the treatments were initiated by i.p.-administration. Specific treatment was given by 211At-labeled farletuzumab (group A; n = 22, 170 kBq/mL) which is specific for OVCAR-3 cells. Control treatments were given by either 211At-labeled rituximab which is unspecific for OVCAR-3 (group B; n = 22, 170 kBq/mL), non-radiolabeled farletuzumab (group C; n = 11) or PBS only (group D; n = 8).
Results
The biodistribution of 211At-farletuzumab was similar to that with 125I as radiolabel, and also to that of 211At-labeled MX35 antibody. The tumor-free fraction (TFF) of the three control groups were all low (PBS 12%, unlabeled specific farletuzumab 9% and unspecific 211At-rituximab 14%). TFF following treatment with 211At-farletuzumab was 91%.