Background
Despite many advances in molecular procedures many lung cancer patients do not receive full panel testing. This can limit the comprehensive understanding of their disease and potentially hinder personalized treatment options.
Conclusions
Mutation profiles differed by histological type and metastases status and were significantly associated with PD-L1 expression. In the context of limited resources, our results may help prioritize patient for testing when tissue material and funding is limited.
Methods
In this retrospective analysis, we used
Results
NGS testing found mutations in 107 (69.5%) patients; 44 patients (28.6%) had more than one mutation. The majority (79.2%) of patients had AC and 64.9% were metastasized at diagnosis. Patients with detected mutations had significantly higher PD-L1 expression than those without mutations (36.4% vs. 19.2%, P=0.005). Mean PD-L1 expression also differed between different mutations ranging from 24.0% in EGFR to 56.8% in patients with MET alterations, and increased with the number of different mutations (P=0.07). EGFR mutations were significantly more common in females compared to males (22.9% vs. 9.5%, P=0.04) and PIK3CA mutations significantly more common in SCC (21.9% vs. 2.5%, P=0.004). We found 23 different mutations in AC and 13 different gene mutations in SCC. Conclusions: Mutation profiles differed by histological type and metastases status and were significantly associated with PD-L1 expression. In the context of limited resources, our results may help prioritize patient for testing when tissue material and funding is limited.