Comparative efficacy of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex as an augmentation strategy versus pharmacological augmentation in non-psychotic, unipolar, treatment-resistant depression: A randomized controlled trial

高频重复经颅磁刺激左侧背外侧前额叶皮层作为辅助治疗策略与药物辅助治疗在非精神病性、单相、难治性抑郁症中的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Depression causes significant morbidity, disability and mortality, along with socioeconomic losses. Patients with depression who don't remit even with the second trial of anti-depressants need optimization, combination or augmentation strategies. Pharmacological strategies sometimes have unacceptable adverse effects. AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) to left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) with that of pharmacological augmentation strategies in unipolar non-psychotic treatment-resistant depression. METHOD: This is a randomized controlled trial. SUBJECTS: Cases of unipolar, non-psychotic, treatment-resistant depression between ages 20 and 60 years were taken. PERIOD OF STUDY: The study period was from November 2016 to May 2018. RANDOMIZATION: Cases diagnosed as per ICD-10 criteria by a qualified psychiatrist. Cases of treatment-resistant depression (100) were divided into two arms by using a random number generator: rTMS arm and treatment as usual (TAU) arm. INTERVENTION: HF-rTMS to left DLPFC (rTMS group) and pharmacological augmentation with lithium, serotonin-dopamine antagonist, buspirone or thyroxine. RESULTS: In the rTMS arm, 44 patients and in TAU arm 41 completed the study. After 4 weeks of treatment augmentation, rTMS and TAU groups showed response rates of 52% and 46%, respectively. The difference between the two groups in terms of number of responders at the end of 4 weeks is not statistically significant. Additionally, factors associated with good response to rTMS were absence of a family history of psychiatric illness, no concomitant psychoactive substance use, being first episode of depression and mild-moderate severity of illness. CONCLUSION: The study did not find rTMS augmentation to be significantly better than standard pharmacological augmentation therapies.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。