Abstract
Autoencoders are the backbones of many imputation methods that aim to relieve the sparsity issue in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. The imputation performance of an autoencoder relies on both the neural network architecture and the hyperparameter choice. So far, literature in the single-cell field lacks a formal discussion on how to design the neural network and choose the hyperparameters. Here, we conducted an empirical study to answer this question. Our study used many real and simulated scRNA-seq datasets to examine the impacts of the neural network architecture, the activation function, and the regularization strategy on imputation accuracy and downstream analyses. Our results show that (i) deeper and narrower autoencoders generally lead to better imputation performance; (ii) the sigmoid and tanh activation functions consistently outperform other commonly used functions including ReLU; (iii) regularization improves the accuracy of imputation and downstream cell clustering and DE gene analyses. Notably, our results differ from common practices in the computer vision field regarding the activation function and the regularization strategy. Overall, our study offers practical guidance on how to optimize the autoencoder design for scRNA-seq data imputation.