A comparison of the Functional Movement Screen(TM) and the Landing Error Scoring System: A cohort study

功能性动作筛查(TM)与着陆误差评分系统的比较:一项队列研究

阅读:1

Abstract

The Functional Movement Screen (FMS(TM)) is a nonspecific movement pattern assessment while the Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) is a screen for movement patterns associated with lower extremity injury. The purpose of this study was to determine if the LESS and FMS(TM) are correlated or if they can be used as complementary assessments of preseason injury risk for anterior cruciate ligament injury. METHODS: FMS(TM) and LESS were used to conduct a cohort study of 126 male National Collegiate Athletic Association Division IA football players. One hundred and eleven players met the criteria for inclusion during data review. At risk and not at risk LESS scores of players and FMS(TM) exercise score status were compared using Welch's t-test. Associations between FMS(TM) composites and LESS scores were evaluated using linear regression. RESULTS: The average LESS score was 5.51±1.34, and the average composite FMS(TM) score was 11.77±2.13 (max=15). A poor FMS(TM) squat score (≤1 or asymmetry present) was associated with a higher LESS score (P<0.001). No other FMS(TM) individual exercise score was associated with an at-risk LESS score (P>0.05). Composite FMS(TM) score was loosely associated with the LESS score (R-squared=0.0677, P=0.006). Prior history of an ACL injury and player position were not associated with LESS score on multivariate regression (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The LESS and FMS(TM) are not well correlated and may serve as complementary assessments for preseason injury risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。