Impact of an interactive CTCA/FFR(CT) interventional stent planning tool on patient management

交互式CTCA/FFR(CT)介入支架规划工具对患者管理的影响

阅读:2

Abstract

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an important determinant of patient outcomes. A new virtual stent planning tool allows users to model PCI and obtain post PCI FFR(CT). We hypothesised that where a sub-optimal post PCI FFR(CT) was predicted theoretical management may be altered prior to invasive angiography. Single-centre retrospective review of patients listed for PCI with preceding CTCA(+ FFR(CT)), (Jan 2023-Sep 2024). Interventional cardiologists (ICs) at our institution determined a theoretical management strategy of (1) medical therapy (GDMT) (2) PCI or (3) multi-disciplinary team meeting (MDT) ± coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on a per-patient and per-vessel basis. The virtual stent planning tool was then unblinded and decision making repeated. Changes to management were compared with Wilcoxon-signed rank test and inter-rater agreement with Fleiss' free marginal kappa. 335 patients had a CTCA(+ FFR(CT)), 96 clinically listed for angiography, 74 included in the study. 73% male, 66 ± 11 years. On a per-patient basis using CTCA(+ FFR(CT)) data PCI was chosen in 95% of cases, GDMT in 4% and MDT ± CABG in 1%. The addition of the virtual planning tool changed management strategy to PCI in 59% of cases, GDMT in 30% and MDT in 11%, Wilcoxon-signed rank test P = 0.04. In patients scheduled to undergo clinically indicated PCI with preceding CTCA(+ FFR(CT)) the use of the virtual stent planning tool significantly altered ICs theoretical management strategy upstream of invasive angiography, with a reduction in PCI, predominantly in favour of GDMT.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。