Abstract
Most non-metalized Salen-type ligands form passivation thin films on electrode surfaces upon electrochemical oxidation. In contrast, the H(2)(3-MeOSalen) forms electroactive polymer films similarly to the corresponding nickel complex. There are no details of electrochemistry, doping mechanism and charge transfer pathways in the polymers of pristine Salen-type ligands. We studied a previously uncharacterized electrochemically active polymer of a Salen-type ligand H(2)(3-MeOSalen) by a combination of cyclic voltammetry, in situ ultraviolet-visible (UV-VIS) spectroelectrochemistry, in situ electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance and Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectroscopy. By directly comparing it with the polymer of a Salen-type nickel complex poly-Ni(3-MeOSalen) we elucidate the effect of the central metal atom on the structure and charge transport properties of the electrochemically doped polymer films. We have shown that the mechanism of charge transfer in the polymeric ligand poly-H(2)(3-MeOSalen) are markedly different from the corresponding polymeric nickel complex. Due to deviation from planarity of N(2)O(2) sphere for the ligand H(2)(3-MeOSalen), the main pathway of electron transfer in the polymer film poly-H(2)(3-MeOSalen) is between π-stacked structures (the π-electronic systems of phenyl rings are packed face-to-face) and C-C bonded phenyl rings. The main way of electron transfer in the polymer film poly-Ni(3-MeOSalen) is along the polymer chain, while redox processes are ligand-based.